Google Apps behind the firewall?

I had a very interesting talk with a friend of mine today (in the most awesome Monmouth Coffee), mainly about the use of technology in high school education. One thing that came up in particular was that the software used by schools (at the behest of the government) to help with education is terribly poor at its job, being both difficult and unpleasant to use.

Of course, in the real world, in steps Google, providing through its Google Apps suite, pretty much everything your organisation could need. Unfortunately for most schools, the demands of a public sector lifestyle make it rather hard to use the Internet proper as part of your software strategy. And it’s not just schools that are in this situation.

Is it just me that thinks that there is a huge opportunity for Google (or anyone else with a similar product, for that matter) if they added the Google Apps applications to the Google box? I note that Iceberg, a DIY-programming application, is available for download and operation behind the firewall. Given that the product ships with a recently produced project management app for design and dev teams, this could prove very popular.

I know the future is in the cloud, but until that point, maybe Ray Ozzie has a point with the whole “software plus services” thing.

Large Hadron Collider

Large Hadron Collider

Every geek needs to have said something about the LHC at some point.

Eventual Bedtime

rel=”me” - really interesting use of XFN microformat to provide security

It turns out that you can claim your blog on Technorati by creating a post (such as this one) and including a link to the claim on Technorati, like so: Technorati Profile

This link’s HTML is a XFN microformat, in that it contains the attribute rel="me":

<a rel="me" href="http://technorati.com/claim/uqv8b6pg22">Technorati Profile</a>

This seems like a genius method of proving that I am authorised to claim this blog, since I had to get into this system to do it. No OpenID, no OAuth, just a hyperlink. I’m sure timbl would approve.

So this was weird

So I was in the pub last night, happily typing away, and a lady came to talk to me about stuff. For some reason that is lost to me now, she had me search for her on YouTube (Gina Joy if you’re interested) and was amazed when this little gem from the 80’s turned up:

According to said lady, the man crawling along on the grass is her husband and they won a load of awards for this track. WIkipedia does not have much to say on the subject, although it appears you can get the track on a compilation record called “Ish”, released in 1990 on “Some Bizarre” records. Get it hot on vinyl here.

Sketchnotes from dConstruct 2008

dConstruct sketchnotes

A handful of us went down to Brighton about a month ago (wow, I’m really doing well with those timely posts) for this year’s dConstruct. For those what don’t know, dConstruct is a very awesome design conference aimed at web people, organised by those charming fellows at ClearLeft (who do loads of stuff, but most recently came out with Silverback, a rather neat little usability testing application).

After seeing Phil and Paul get into sketchnotes at previous conferences, I thought I’d have a go myself. Here’s my flickr set of the results.

dConstruct08 on the web:

dConstruct08 on Flickr
dConstruct08 on Slideshare

The 3 Stages of Problem Solving

Design Museum

This is old. We went to the London Design Museum in August for a kind of team-day-out-sort-of-thing. It’s an amazing space. I had a hangover, so I drew these.


Ryanair


I flew back from Berlin on Tuesday morning (more about that later). I flew Ryanair. Never again.

Screen-scraping. What have I learnt?

The system is not the enemy, the system is the beaten, broken and smothered dumb creature you are poking at through the gaps in its kerosene memory. It has glutinous feelers that react to your touch in unexpected ways until you conquer the chaos by learning to read patterns and see the standing waves and inflexion points. The system can be tamed, much like any other dumb animal; the question is one of approach: a lion tamer does not approach a lion from behind and carrying an airhorn.

I have been in the ring with the system and we have stared at each other long and hard, me seeking a bond or an understanding, my partner passive and unmoving. Its colours vibrate when you attack with a flourish of hand gestures, thinly intruding from the front, like a toreador with a red cape. It makes not to wince but envelops when you sink in a probe, leaving barbs as you go, stuck into the dough-like body. And, again, like the bullfighter, stabbing many times in a slow dance, leaving brightly coloured flags emerging from the jelly, the system bouyant beneath you, reflecting your effort, now you realise the flaws in your tools: the hammer is not heavy enough, the rope is too coarse, the sword is too round. But this is ok and this is what the system teaches you, gives back to you in the manner of dumb beasts. This has only been the first round and your energy is not so much spent but less wild. This system is not the enemy and now you see it.

The tools become sharper, your sword-turned-scalpel is given back for keyhole use and your eye cares less for the rippling outer layer the system shakes, but for the straight and shadowy paths straight to its rough avocado nut at the centre. You feel like a gadget-man, a tinkerer, a man of tools.

The hope is always to blast away some abstraction, to see right through the fumes and the thickness, and to know the beast all at once. However, this is the desperate monkey-brain acting out, who wants everything complex to be simple, everything small to be visible; the brain who wishes peace and love and perfect fucking. The beast in the ring is not your enemy, nor is it your friend. You share a purely transactional relationship and, no matter how many brightly coloured ribbons you leave dangling from its sides, it will forget you the moment your insistent prodding disappears. You will be wise not to look back as you leave.